A Christian who admires Buddha? Many friends are confused and think two gods are being worshipped. Siddhartha was a man and never claimed to be otherwise. His gold statues that people seem to pray to are rather reminders to an honoured teacher's lessons; the gold acts as a mirror so that we can see our own image, for indeed his teaching was meant to inspire us to follow his path to enlightenment.
To be inspired and practise much of what the Buddha was teaching one might first see him as a saint or Old Testament prophet. He lived 500 years before Christ in a region already civilised, much like ancient Egypt, with kings and dynasties, complex religious worship to a vast array of deities and an oppressive caste system. Born a prince with wealth and stability, as a child he saw people suffering and knew that regardless of ritual, prayer or position people would continue to suffer. His answer was to give it all up and seek out the answer to living without suffering himself. And he did. And having found the answer, he decided to teach it to whomever would listen. He started with a diagnosis of suffering, a recognition that in this mortal life people will suffer. Recognition of suffering is the first step to curing it, he taught. Then that there is an end to suffering. With medical reasoning he describes the cure as voluntary changes to ones lifestyle: in the west people like to call it a philosophy, and like the ancient Greek philosophers, he lived exactly as he taught. Living moderately in all things, meditating regularly to learn how to control the endlessly grasping mind, knowing stillness to observe in ones Self the slavish patterns of action and reaction to all stimuli which kept one tied to emotional suffering, to live in peace and love with all life, to give and give some more knowing that nothing on this Earth remains forever, and to develop ones own wisdom and compassion are essential. Suffering will happen, he pointed out, for that is the nature of this mortal life, however, we can choose how to react to this suffering; we don't have to let worldly changes and conditions to cause suffering!
Though this eastern culture was not granted the One God's Laws, the Buddha challenged the existing system of his day and found a better, grass-roots, approach to living in peace and allowing individuals to know the Reality of Love. He never clearly described what lay at the end of his path to enlightenment. Coming from a culture of centuries old religious bias, he instead encouraged others to find out for themselves. The way to this Truth is worthwhile. How can he explain that which the human mind and tongue cannot explain? Truth must be experienced.
There are more than enough similarities with this Truth in the west, from prophets to saints, from Christ's example to the gospels and sacraments that Christians share. I benefit from the simple personal application of Buddha's wisdom: his Truth is God, me thinks. We can sit around discussing the nature and messages of God and change nothing of our own lives and societies, indeed it seems to me that this is more prevalent than those who choose to actually take the initiative, change the way one lives ones life and know God through ones own personal experience. The outward trappings of religion are cultural. The inward workings of vigilant, moment to moment practise are divine, me thinks, developing reason and wisdom, knowing compassion and love, giving instead of receiving, coming closer to the universal Truth of Love.
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa.
Deo gratias.
To be inspired and practise much of what the Buddha was teaching one might first see him as a saint or Old Testament prophet. He lived 500 years before Christ in a region already civilised, much like ancient Egypt, with kings and dynasties, complex religious worship to a vast array of deities and an oppressive caste system. Born a prince with wealth and stability, as a child he saw people suffering and knew that regardless of ritual, prayer or position people would continue to suffer. His answer was to give it all up and seek out the answer to living without suffering himself. And he did. And having found the answer, he decided to teach it to whomever would listen. He started with a diagnosis of suffering, a recognition that in this mortal life people will suffer. Recognition of suffering is the first step to curing it, he taught. Then that there is an end to suffering. With medical reasoning he describes the cure as voluntary changes to ones lifestyle: in the west people like to call it a philosophy, and like the ancient Greek philosophers, he lived exactly as he taught. Living moderately in all things, meditating regularly to learn how to control the endlessly grasping mind, knowing stillness to observe in ones Self the slavish patterns of action and reaction to all stimuli which kept one tied to emotional suffering, to live in peace and love with all life, to give and give some more knowing that nothing on this Earth remains forever, and to develop ones own wisdom and compassion are essential. Suffering will happen, he pointed out, for that is the nature of this mortal life, however, we can choose how to react to this suffering; we don't have to let worldly changes and conditions to cause suffering!
Though this eastern culture was not granted the One God's Laws, the Buddha challenged the existing system of his day and found a better, grass-roots, approach to living in peace and allowing individuals to know the Reality of Love. He never clearly described what lay at the end of his path to enlightenment. Coming from a culture of centuries old religious bias, he instead encouraged others to find out for themselves. The way to this Truth is worthwhile. How can he explain that which the human mind and tongue cannot explain? Truth must be experienced.
There are more than enough similarities with this Truth in the west, from prophets to saints, from Christ's example to the gospels and sacraments that Christians share. I benefit from the simple personal application of Buddha's wisdom: his Truth is God, me thinks. We can sit around discussing the nature and messages of God and change nothing of our own lives and societies, indeed it seems to me that this is more prevalent than those who choose to actually take the initiative, change the way one lives ones life and know God through ones own personal experience. The outward trappings of religion are cultural. The inward workings of vigilant, moment to moment practise are divine, me thinks, developing reason and wisdom, knowing compassion and love, giving instead of receiving, coming closer to the universal Truth of Love.
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa.
Deo gratias.