do not act in compliance with the desires of your former ignorance
but, as he who called you is holy,
be holy yourselves in every aspect of your conduct,
for it is written, Be holy because I am holy (1 Pt 1:14-16)
From my position in Ontario, Canada i am following the new cardinal Collins' outcry against the government's proposal to allow 'Gay-Straight Alliances' at all schools, including the Catholic. What's in a name? He doesn't accept the name of a school club which through the initiative of students could be formed to fight bullying. Which teacher would supervise this club, he asks with a note of being scandalized? He would prefer to regulate a solution to bullying himself, preferably then with another name. And probably another emphasis, i'll add.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church formally 'diagnoses' homosexuality as 'intrinsically disordered', just as someone born with a birth defect, a handicap or say, schizophrenia (a mental disorder occurring after birth). These are sick people, whose illness 'under no circumstances can be approved' the formal teaching states. A 'Gay-Straight Alliance' might then suggest approval? Though singled out and not approved, the homosexual person, however, 'must be accepted with respect, compassion and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided' the CCC goes on to say. We love the person but hate the disorder, i paraphrase. So too, there are then situations that might allow for 'just discrimination'? Such as purposefully and methodically keeping these children in the dark realm of confusion, self-hate, suffering and never letting them forget that they are disordered, sick and without approval. A bizarre message, indeed, hate them, pity them, tolerate them, but never accept them. Nay, any link or alliance between gay and straight must be severed, all doors must be shut lest approval be shown, as though the disease be contagious. Society used to do this with cripples and crazies, mongoloids and retards, tormented, mocked, locked away at home, a shame to family and a burden to society: politically incorrect now to even so state and consider such things, no?
Reading the Gospels i come across a Jesus who heals, has time to cast out demons and who invites publicans and prostitutes to his table. He lets them know that they are intrinsically good, that God loves them and invites them to change their lives (to be more like children, sober, holy) in the service to the Lord of Love and in the service of our neighbours. Love is inclusive. Love is letting the light shine in. Love is teaching through example.
But i digress. The Catholic Schools of Ontario demand self-regulation. I am also following the mess that the Vatican currently is in, called 'Vatileaks'. Corruption at all levels, cronyism, nepotism, power struggles in the curia, mismanagement and a bid to make their finances transparent, these 'sins' have cast a long shadows over the house of our Pope. And reflecting on a spring season of Church sex scandals come to light and long overdue public admissions and repentance, me thinks, self-regulation might not be the best antidote to the problems.
Therefore, gird up the loins of your mind, live soberly (1 Pt 1:13)
Whether gay or straight, layman banker or Vatican banker, school official or cardinal, we might all benefit from real, transparent acts of sobriety and acts motivated by and grounded in the grace of God. We all sin. We all need each other. We all might give our behaviour more attention. We all might accuse others less, hold our mouths and not cast that stone. What kind of Christianity do we want to see a millennium from now? What message would be ringing sound and true through out society? What kind of behaviour are we teaching by example to our children? May Love be our guide, the Lord's grace our hope and His mercy our foundation.
Deo gratias.